Vermont Nonprofit Home Health Agencies Fight For-Profit Encroachment
The agencies want their exclusive charter for a $90 million business, saying that for-profit competitors will skim most-easily served clients.
The Vermont Assembly of Home Health Agencies is appealing to the Vermont Supreme Court to overturn a grant of a certificate of need to the for-profit Professional Nurses Service of Winooski. Until now, the 12 nonprofit home health agencies have been the exclusive providers of home health care in the state.
The argument is a simple one: the for-profit claims that people are not being adequately served, while the nonprofits say that for-profit competitors will take away the easiest-to-serve clients, leaving them unable to survive, since currently they are required to serve all in need in their respective geographical areas.
The home health business is large enough to attract attention from would-be for-profit ventures. The twelve nonprofit agencies have a combined revenue of over
Here are the agencies:
VNA of Chittenden and Grand Isle Counties EIN 03-0179603 Form 990
VNA and Hospice of Vermont and New Hampshire EIN 03-6006494 Form 990
Central Vermont Home Health & Hospice EIN 03-0186089 Form 990
Rutland Area VNA & Hospice EIN 03-0185024 Form 990
Franklin County Home Health Agency EIN 23-7076401 Form 990
Addison County Home Health & Hospice EIN 23-7032401 Form 990
VNA and Hospice of SVHC EIN 03-0302664 Form 990
Orleans, Essex VNA & Hospice EIN 23-7418021 Form 990
Lamoille Home Health & Hospice EIN 03-0224616 Form 990
Manchester Health Services EIN 03-0182056 Form 990
Dorset Nursing Association EIN 03-0217139 Form 990
Caledonia Home Health Care & Hospice (Not Found)
The trend toward for-profit home health seems to be widespread. Here is a story from West Virginina about the sale of a nonprofit home-health agency operated by Highland Hospital Association (EIN 03-0185024 Form 990). In this case, the selling organization focuses primarily in mental health care, and the sale of the visiting nurse subsidiary will finance other expansion.
It also looks as though all this activity remains a bit under the radar. An article from the 2001 Home Health Care Services Quarterly reported that there have been few studies that compared the performance of for-profit and nonprofit home health care.
I may be biased, but I just don't see how CONs are ever a good thing. I have never heard of a community being over-served by medical options, and it seems that if qualified providers were allowed to offer medical services in high-quality facilities of any description, everyone would be better off. Is that just me?
Posted by: Leona | June 21, 2006 at 03:05 PM