Hawaii's charity solicitation report demonstrates why large scale charities continue to rely on contract fundraising. It works for them.
Taking a look at the charity solicitation report of the Hawaii attorney general for the year ended June 30, 2007, I found a mixed bag of results among the two hundred reported campaigns, hardly the bleak picture painted by the press in the story Hawaii charities left with little after fundraisers take cut, Rob Perez. Yet it also shows that fundraising is not a sure thing—even large scale, well known charities can have disappointingly low returns.
The only fundraiser that produced consistently high returns for charity was Coinstar, the company that operates coin-counting kiosks. Coinstar has a program for donating change to selected charity partners with a reduction in its usual fee from 8.9% to 7.5%. But while it's efficient in percentage terms, it's not that potent as a fundraiser. Coinstar collected a whopping $1,046.75 in Hawaii in 2006-2007 and passed on $969.26, charging just $77.49 to write checks to the American Red Cross, Habitat for Humanity, the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society and the World Wildlife Fund.
At the other end of the spectrum, even the largest scale campaigns in the report were all over the place in net yield to charity (click on the image to the right for the table, which opens in a new window).
There were twenty-one campaigns that reported gross receipts over a million dollars (we are guessing that these are full US campaign results, not just the Hawaii portion, but there's nothing in the report to confirm this).
- The range of yield is from a bit over 7% (Humane Society of America/Share Group) to 82% (Sierra Club/Telefund).
- Ten campaigns (about half) are bunched in the 50% to 75% yield range. Sierra Club and St. Jude's Children's Hospital were above that.
- There's mixed support for the contention that controversial causes have lower yields. Planned Parenthood had a campaign with an impressive 65% yield, and the Human Rights Campaign (for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equal rights) was close behind with a 63% yield. But the ACLU, the National Resources Defense Council, and the National Right to Life Committee all had campaigns with yields in the twenties. The National Organization for Women had two campaigns with about a 50% yield.
- Overall, animal groups did not fare well. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals registered a 54% yield and the Humane Society of the United States reported the worst performance of a large scale campaign at 7%.
- It is hard to generalize the results because it appears that they employ a range of methods. Some appear to be telemarketing campaigns (from the name of the soliciting group). But the largest campaign, for the Paralyzed Veterans of America (EIN 13-1946868 Form 990), surely represents that organization's flagship direct mail campaign of personalized address labels.
- And even the worst-performing campaign had a return in absolute dollars in excess of $100,000. The median return in dollars for a campaign with a yield under 50% was $466,000. Even when the percentage yield is less than desirable, these campaigns still provide substantial dollar returns. So charities continue to employ them to recruit new donors and to follow up with old ones.
there would have been more "i love yous" ... more "i'm sorrys"... but mostly, given another shots at life, i would seize every minute... look at it and really see it...live it...and never give it back.
Posted by: christian louboutin | November 04, 2010 at 02:15 AM
A good name is easier lost than won.
Posted by: ugg outlet | November 11, 2010 at 03:28 AM
Great, the inside of the many I expect things. Thank you to let me share the joy. Finally I wish you good health, success in work!
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | November 11, 2010 at 04:18 AM
Tierney says that larger scale organizations would have access to other resources, which I suspect means that they pay for consulting services from Bain at the going rate. Bridgespan's Form 990 reports that the company operates with consultants borrowed from Bain & Company, which continues to pay their salaries while on loan.
Posted by: air jordans | March 18, 2011 at 11:08 PM
Many thanks for the article. I will have a link back to this information from our fresh blog.
http://www.cheaphatcaps.com
http://www.cheaphatcaps.com
http://www.cheaphatcaps.com
Posted by: DC Hats | July 14, 2011 at 04:04 AM
ところが、十津川村野尻では増水した川が村営住宅2棟をのみ込んで2家族が流され、五條市大塔町宇井では多数の行方不明者が出ていたことなどから、川上村の被害が広く知られることはなかった
今も現場は土砂に覆われたままだが、迂回(うかい)路も通り、土砂の除去も少しずつだが進む。管轄の吉野土木事務所は「来年4月中旬ごろをめどに、崩落箇所に仮の橋をつくり通行できるようにしたい」としている。
こうした復興のつち音は響いているものの、観光への風評被害は続く。村の観光の中心でもある「ホテル杉の湯」などは通常通り営業しているが、迂回部分に立地するため見逃されがち。
Posted by: バーバリーマフラー | November 04, 2011 at 03:21 AM
ティンバーランド12日に判明した政府の社会保障分野の一体改革素案(骨子案)は、来年の法案提出を検討してきた受診時定額負担制度の見送りを容認するなど、負担増を先送りしようとする民主党の主張に大幅に譲歩する内容となった。公務員の特権に切り込むことが期待された被用者年金一元化でも、公務員の優遇措置の存続に道を開く文言が盛り込まれた。「公平な負担」を旗印とした社会保障改革の看板は大きくゆがみつつある。
ティンバーランド骨子案は、病院を訪れるたびに患者が100円を上乗せして支払う受診時定額負担制度について「(導入見送りを掲げた)民主党ワーキングチームの報告を踏まえる」と記した。70~74歳の窓口負担の2割への引き上げでは「平成24年度の対応については調整」と、その後の引き上げに含みを残したが、党側の猛反発で撤回に追いやられるのは確実な情勢だ。
Posted by: ティンバーランド | December 12, 2011 at 08:25 PM