Powered by TypePad

April 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

« Jerry Lewis & Don Imus: The Downside of Charity-Celebrity Co-Dependency | Main | Unusually Large Charity Fraud—in Alaska! »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83452056969e200e54eeea9798834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Doonesbury Plugs DonorsChoose:

Comments

Missy

Thanks for writing about DonorsChoose.org!

We agree that the financial practices of high-growth nonprofit organizations should be scrutinized, and we welcome any questions you and your readers might have. We are proud to operate a philanthropic model in which a high level of accountability and transparency is offered to every donor, at every donation amount. We are confident that our practices adhere to the highest standards of integrity, evidenced by our "4-Star Charity designation by Charity Navigator: http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/search.summary/orgid/9284.htm

We will do our best to address your key points below.

Revenues vs Expenses
Whenever individual donors fully fund a project on DonorsChoose.org, we purchase the resources within 10 days. Our revenues on the 990 were higher than our program expenses last year for two reasons:

First, we've been raising funds for our national expansion. (The $11mm in national expansion funds is being supplied by DonorsChoose.org backers; no website donations designated for classroom projects are set aside for expansion funding.) A significant fraction of this $11mm was booked as revenue during 2006, but we'll be spending it out over the next 5 years to build our infrastructure and to help fund classroom projects in schools new to DonorsChoose.org. At the end of 5 years, we aim to be self-sustaining and no longer expect to seek operating grants of this nature.

Secondly, we carry a surplus of funds in our system. These funds include foundation grants that have not yet been applied to proposals and unredeemed gift certificates.

Our impact page ( http://www.donorschoose.org/about/impact.html ) represents real program dollars delivered to classrooms. (Note that the chart is for calendar years, while the 990 tracks our fiscal year which is July-June.) These numbers are "live" as they come directly out of the database that drives our website, so it's the best way to see how much has gone directly to the public schools.

Timeliness of Filing
Last year we did file our 990 late, but we're working very hard with our independent auditor to make sure this year's tax filing is on time.

One of the challenges of running a transparent micro-philanthropy site is tracking all of the transactional details. For each funded classroom project, we have a fiduciary responsibility to spend each donation on only that project's materials. Therefore we are tracking the purchase of every pencil, every microscope, every book, every bus trip, etc. across dozens of vendors and thousands of projects. With 28,210 donations last year, restricted to 21,903 specific projects, the accounting quickly gets complex.

Program Services
At DonorsChoose.org, a donor is not obligated to pay for any overhead costs. When you fund a project, you can choose to have 100% of the donation go towards the direct project costs, or make an additional "fulfillment" gift to DonorsChoose.org. This additional gift is entirely optional.

If you choose to support our overhead costs with this optional gift, it will go toward those Program Services needed to enable our "philanthropic marketplace." In bringing classroom projects to life, DonorsChoose.org 1) authenticates and reviews teacher essays and resource lists; 2) purchases resources and tracks shipments, and 3) routes packages of classroom thank-you notes and photos to our donors. This work includes keeping the website running, providing customer service to teachers and donors, attracting teachers to the site, and encouraging donors to visit our web site to fund these projects.

Improving the efficiency and automating the process by which we purchase and distribute the donor-funded classroom resources is one of our primary focuses as we grow. For example, it used to take us hours to purchase the materials for a project; now it's a matter of minutes, thanks in part to the integration of e-procurement technologies into our web system.

Amount of Work Required from Teachers
DonorsChoose.org has attracted tens of thousands of teachers because we require much less work than a typical grant proposal; less time spent grant-writing, tracking, and reporting:
* DonorsChoose.org provides an open field where the teacher writes a few, jargon-free paragraphs about a student learning experience they want to make possible. The process takes about half an hour.
* Most grant processes send teachers a check, require them to procure the resources they need, and then require a detailed expenditure report; DonorsChoose.org purchases resources for the teacher, ships them to their classroom, and compiles an expenditure report automatically.
* Once a grant is fulfilled, reporting on many grants consists of pages of text and data and receipts. Reporting on a DonorsChoose.org project is a creative classroom activity, where students write thank-you notes to donors. Teachers have told us that they find this is a valuable experience, because it helps students develop their writing skills and teaches them to demonstrate gratitude.

The large number of teachers using DonorsChoose.org is the best testament to the comparative ease and efficiency of submitting projects at DonorsChoose.org. More than 18,000 teachers have posted classroom projects at DonorsChoose.org and 43% of them have returned to submit a second grant. They come back not only because posting a project is relatively easy, but also because the chance of their project getting funded is 60%.

We hold ourselves to the highest standards of accountability, and we welcome the opportunity to share the financial and operational details of our exciting philanthropic model.

My contact info is below. You can also direct any questions to César Bocanegra, our EVP of Operations (cesar at donorschoose dot org) and Andy Kaplan, our CFO (andyk at donorschoose dot org).

Thanks for writing about us and don't hesitate to be in touch if you have any further questions!

-- Missy Sherburne, EVP of Program, DonorsChoose.org
missy at donorschoose dot org

new balance

There is no paradise on earth equal to the union of love and innocence .

shox shoes

No neighborhood could build a perpetual constitution, as well just like a perpetual law.(Thomas Jefferson, the states president)

Auto Parts & Electronics

Thank you for sharing. Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Have a good time.

keylogger Mac

There is no paradise on earth equal to the union of love and innocence .
complete agree

Hogan Sito Ufficiale

Wonderful illustrated information. I thank you about that. No doubt it will be very useful for my future projects. Would like to see some other posts on the same subject!

Cheap Red Bull Hats

Many thanks for the article. I will have a link back to this information from our fresh blog. Thanks again.
http://www.cheaphatcaps.com
http://www.cheaphatcaps.com
http://www.cheaphatcaps.com

バーバリーマフラー

死者·行方不明者約100人に上った台風12号による紀伊半島豪雨から2カ月が経過した。その間、死者·行方不明者や孤立集落が集中した奈良県十津川村や五條市大塔(おおとう)町は注目が集まり、復旧·復興に多くの支援も寄せられた。一方で、被害の深刻さや復旧の姿が伝わらず、風評被害に苦しみながら復興に向かっている被災地もある。
同県中部に位置する川上村は、県内で発生した約1800カ所の土砂崩れの中でも、人家に隣接した崩落としては最大規模で、土砂崩壊量が概算で東京ドーム1杯分に相当する大規模な土砂災害に見舞われた。土砂崩れの発生は9月4日午後5時半ごろ。役場の電灯が突然消え、近くの国道169号を大量の土砂が埋め尽くした。

ティンバーランド

ティンバーランド労組への配慮も顕著だ。会社員らの厚生年金と公務員らの共済年金の一元化問題では、公務員労組から支援を受ける議員が「人事院が来年2月に公表する会社員と公務員の退職金比較調査の結果が出るまでは、共済年金の特権的な上乗せ部分である職域加算の取り扱いを決めるべきではない」と主張。時間稼ぎをして法案の中身を骨抜きにしようという意図は明白だが、骨子案はあっさりとその主張を受け入れた。

 ティンバーランド首相は年末までに、社会保障分野と消費税増税部分をあわせた一体改革素案をまとめる方針だ。古本伸一郎党税調事務局長は12日の党一体改革?税制両調査会合同会議で、「31日の除夜の鐘のところまで、みなさんと相談していきたい」と強調したが、抜本的な改革は先送り必至の情勢だ。

The comments to this entry are closed.