Kitchen Democracy Turns into Online Oligarchy

A tiny nonprofit operates a web site that allows citizens to weigh in on local issues like zoning changes without attending city council meeings.  But there are complaints of ballot stuffing in online polls, which a little analysis shows is a credible claim.   

The East Bay Express (Jeremy Singer-Vine) reports on discontent with a web site with the public purpose of increasing participation in local government.  Kitchen Democracy (EIN 20-5151205 too small for a Form 990) was started by Robert Vogel and his wife Simona Carini in March of 2006. 

Its web site is so well thought out and slick in its presentation that it's hard to believe that it's the work of a single dedicated couple.  Elected officials and registered participants have the ability to suggest topics for discussion.  For the topics suggested by participants, other participants rate the participant topics for importance, actionability, balance, and clarity.  Based on the ratings, these topics are then moved to the open issues section, where participants are allowed to vote and comment on them.  There are over 2,000 registered participants, but average participation in votes is a bit over a hundred. 

Controversy arose because city councilman Gordon Wozniak took interest in the site, and even provided $3,000 in funding for it.  The plurality of registered users are from his district, which other councilmen say is not representative of the city as a whole (apparently it is more affluent and has fewer minority residents). 

In one instance, a zoning proposal to convert a garage into a restaurant (which would create local parking issues) was put to a vote on Kitchen Democracy and received an 80% favorable decision, prompting claims of ballot stuffing. 

I took a look at the votes so far on KitchenDemocracy.org to see whether there were any patterns (click image to enlarge).  What I found was that the average number of votes in the case of lopsided decisions (80% or more for one side) was 235, while the average close vote (less than 80% for the winning side) had only 90 votes.  Three of the top four issues in total participation were local zoning issues that one would not ordinarily expect to attract wide interest, and the side favoring zoning change had margings of 70% of 235 votes, 80% of 217 votes, and 92% of 409 votes. 

Kitchen Democracy as presently constituted seems like an excellent and well thought-out way for the affluent to publicize issues that they are concerned about and to make their views known to their elected officials.  Anybody can participate in theory, but in practice those with a vested interest in any given subject will be able to dominate the conversation.  Of course that's more like oligarchy than democracy, but nobody ever said the Internet was for everybody. 

Comments

[Robert Vogel]

Thanks for the compliments about the site design. Indeed, Kitchen Democracy is largly the work of me and my wife - it has consumed nearly 100% of my time over the past 16 months!

The statistical trends you observe are true, and simply reflect the fact that issues which attract large vote counts tend to do so on one side of the issue - When people feel strongly, they tend to feel strongly about one side but not the other.

As for your concerns about the role of the affluent versus the general population, I share them. Affluent residents are overrepresented on Kitchen Democracy, leading some to believe that it represents the vested interests of the wealthy. While the affluent do indeed participate more than the poor, this is true not only for Kitchen Democracy. Unfortunately, this problem is endemic to our political system; just look who actually votes in elections.

The good news is that Kitchen Democracy makes government accessible to anyone who uses a computer (including those at the public library). Because going online is considerably easier than attending late-night meetings, we believe Kitchen Democracy makes the democratic process more inclusive of a diverse range of participants. In fact, Kitchen Democracy issues typically attract participation from 10 times as many people as agenda items discussed solely in council chambers. More importantly, it appears that this is true for participants from the poorest district to the most affluent.

[MLB Hats]

Many thanks for the article. I will have a link back to this information from our fresh blog.
http://www.cheaphatcaps.com
http://mvpcaps.org
http://caps2011.com
http://hats-club.com

[Cheap New Era Hats]

Thanks for your opinion. I am very lucky to get this tips from you.

[バーバリーマフラー]

東京都で処理を受け入れた岩手県宮古市の東日本大震災の災害廃棄物（がれき）第１便約３０トンが３日、貨物列車でＪＲ東京貨物ターミナル駅（品川区）に到着し、７トン積みコンテナ計６個が都内３カ所の中間処理施設に運び込まれた。震災のがれきが東北以外で受け入れられたのは初めて。
２日夜に盛岡市を出たコンテナは３日午前、相次いで東京貨物ターミナル駅に到着。フォークリフトでトラックに積み替えられ、各地の処理施設に向かった。このうちコンテナ１個が搬入された大田区の処理施設では、重機や手作業で金属などの不燃物が分けられ、可燃物は燃やしやすいように破砕された。がれきには、木材や木くずに加え、布団やネクタイ、ぬいぐるみなど、津波で流されたとみられるさまざまな生活の品が泥にまみれて交ざっていた。

[Bobbie]

AFAIC that's the best awsner so far!

[ティンバーランド]

ティンバーランド付近住民らが数日前から目撃したのも同じ男とみられ、近くの女性も取材に「事件が発覚する何日か前の午前８時ごろ、尾崎さん宅の玄関門扉前に段ボールを持って立つ黒っぽい服装の不審な男を見た」と話した。東側の別の門扉の前には、バイクが止められていたという。

　ティンバーランド一方、堺市南区の歯科医師の妻、田村武子さん（６７）が行方不明になっている事件に絡んで窃盗容疑で逮捕された西口宗宏容疑者（５０）とよく似た男が尾崎さんの事件があった日、同市内の農協支所で、尾崎さんのキャッシュカードを使い残高を照会。その際、支所付近の防犯カメラには、黒っぽい服装の男が黒いバイクで乗り付ける姿が記録されていた。

　府警は、西口容疑者方から黒い原付きバイクを押収し、関連の有無を調べている。