The two largest Blue Cross organizations in Pennsylvania, both still nonprofits, want to merge. But why?
Confusion and a wait-and-see approach seems to be the main response to the annoucement of proposed merger by Highmark Blue Cross (business league, EIN 25-0558173, no Form 990 available, financial report) of Pittsburgh and Independence Blue Cross (nonprofit, but no info available) of Philadelphia.
Each organization already dominates its market and the two service areas don't overlap (between them are two other Blue Cross associations in northeastern and central Pennsylvania). The organizations claimed that the merger would produce a billion in savings due to administrative consolidation and increased bargaining power, but also that job reductions of 1,000 positions could be accomplished by attrition and reassignment rather than layoffs.
In the mid-1990s, it looked as though the Blue Cross/Blue Shield organizations would eventually merge into maybe fifteen or so (as the head of the New Jersey Blue Cross organization speculated in this 1996 article in the New York Times). But that didn't happen, and there are today just under forty organizations, down from a hundred. There is one large system, Wellpoint/Anthem, which is for-profit (its tortuous early history is available at this site and later developments are reported here) and which has the Blue Cross operations from California to Missouri to Ohio to Connecticut. Other systems combine just two to four organizations, generally in close proximity.
Apparently the Wellpoint/Anthem acquisition program was stopped by state attorney generals who wanted to extract high compensation for conversion of plans from nonprofit status.
Yet Pennsylvania is unusual with four remaining BCBS licensees. The only other state with so many is New York. Most states have just one licensee.
When Senator Arlen Spector held a field hearing on the merger by the Senate Judiciary Committee, the comments seemed pretty noncommittal. The only exception was Professor Lawton Burns from Wharton, who sharply questioned the claim of benefits and added that mergers of roughly equal partners tend to go badly. He and others mentioned research (the source of which I haven't been able to find) that showed that economies of scale in HMO health plans max out at 100,000 participants, while both of these programs have millions.
So what's the benefit? Possibly it has to do with developing programs of national scope. IBC featured in its annual report its development of a system for Medicare administration for a consortium of Blue Cross programs from Minnesota to Montana.
It's definitely not about compensation. Highmark CEO Kenneth Melani received $3.22 million in 2005, which included a $2 million bonus. His 2004 salary was $1.67 million, which Trent Stamp's Charity Navigator considered reasonable in this 2005 story in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
This tends to confirm my theory that Mr. Stamp and Charity Navigator believe that just about anything goes as long as a charity doesn't use telemarketing or direct mail.
It could be executive transition. IBC lost its long-time CEO G. Fred DiBona to cancer in 2005 (he was 53). Current CEO Joseph A. Frick stepped into the position from his previous role as senior vice president for human resources and administration and could be viewed as a transitional appointment. A merger could be the easiest way for IBC to move forward.
Supporting this idea is the fact that a loophole in Pennsylvania law gives the state insurance commissioner no authority over mergers between nonnprofit insurers, while the McCarran Ferguson Act exempts insurance companies from most antitrust actions. So perhaps the best answer to the question of why these two organizations want to merge is: because they can.
This may really be what they say it is; a way to save money by reducing overhead. Or they are ganging up to buy another company.
Posted by: Maryland Health Insurance | January 05, 2008 at 02:09 AM
The reason why they want to merger is because the State of PA is going to vote on a Health Insurance program for all adults in the state. It will provide free coverage to all. If Highmark and Keystone merge they will have 70% of the states insured and will be the obvious choice for the bid of health carrier to handle all the new enrollees. Plain and simple: They want more money.
Posted by: Kimberly Long | August 20, 2008 at 04:36 PM
The real reasons for the failed merge were two--Highmark wanted to take over IBC--so it would be more valuable for a possible future merger,after conversion to a for-profit,with Wellpoint--- The IBC executives simply wanted to enrich themselves with golden parachutes,covering up all the bobbleheaded "decisions" made since the death of Fred DiBona. The most recent IBC fiascos since the merger failed clearly prove the above statements---IBC will lose on a pretax basis more dollars than in its +60 year history,Butler has already announced his "early" retirement--with Frick close to follow---both taking very rich compensation packages with them--as well as having pushed "knowledge" employees out the door with that phony early retirement "gift"--they should all be ashamed--including their esteemed board chairman!!
Posted by: bob | March 30, 2010 at 02:41 PM
Thank you for sharing this excellent article. So cool. It bring me a sense of comfortable. We shoule smile to the society and work more harder to creating a better tomorrow.
Posted by: Air Jordan | June 16, 2010 at 10:01 PM
The world is often unkind to new talent, new creations. But your only limit is your soul.
Posted by: coach sale | July 14, 2010 at 04:14 AM
As long as there is a kind of infinite self-confidence heart filled with a strong will, and independent of any wisdom, someday will be successful.Do you think so?
Posted by: Jordan Retro 6 | October 06, 2010 at 05:15 AM
found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..
Posted by: 5150 Snowboard Bindings | November 06, 2010 at 04:33 PM
Wow! what an idea ! What a concept ! Beautiful .. Amazing � :)
Posted by: 2011 Head Snowboard | November 06, 2010 at 08:37 PM
I keep listening to the news speak about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the best site to get one.
Posted by: 2011 Ride Snowboard GEAR | November 07, 2010 at 04:53 AM
found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..
Posted by: Burton Wide Snowboard | November 07, 2010 at 08:10 AM
just go around, but surprised by your blogs, the information is so interesting,I deeply attract by it.
Posted by: ugg boots | November 10, 2010 at 03:50 AM
I am not very satisfied by the way the article has come to a conclusion.
Posted by: cheap jersey | June 29, 2011 at 05:58 AM
Many thanks for the article. I will have a link back to this information from our fresh blog.
http://cheaphatsstore.com
http://mvpcaps.org
http://caps2011.com
http://hats-club.com
Posted by: Cheap Hats | July 29, 2011 at 11:21 PM
Thanks for your opinion. I am very lucky to get this tips from you.
Posted by: Cheap New Era Hats | September 13, 2011 at 03:38 AM
I find life an exciting business,The point is succinctness of expression.
Posted by: red sole | September 28, 2011 at 07:22 AM
東京電力福島第一原発事故で東電に巨額の損失が生じたのは、経営陣が地震や津波の安全対策を怠ってきたためだとして、株主らが東電に対し、歴代の経営陣に損害賠償請求訴訟を起こすよう求める書面を提出する方針を固めたことが分かった
請求額や対象者を検討した上で、今月中にも提出したいとしている。提出後、60日以内に東電が提訴しない場合、株主代表訴訟を東京地裁に起こすという。
株主の一人は「このままでは、過去の経営陣の責任追及があいまいになってしまう。裁判で責任の所在をはっきりさせるべきだ」と話した。一方、東電は「内容を把握していないので、コメントは差し控える」としている。
Posted by: バーバリーマフラー | November 04, 2011 at 04:11 AM
i went to the same school as patrick. i remeber those girls from my school who wrote in. they were white trash...i always felt so bad for them.
Posted by: supra footwear | November 14, 2011 at 08:49 AM
ティンバーランドカナダのケント環境相は12日、先進国に温室効果ガスの排出削減義務を課した京都議定書から正式に離脱することを明らかにした。主要メディアが報じた。
ティンバーランド同環境相は「わが国は京都議定書から正式に離脱する法的権利を行使する」と述べた。
Posted by: ティンバーランド | December 12, 2011 at 10:45 PM