Fundraisers again have this simple tool for setting campaign goals by size of gift. But users need to mindful of one pitfall.
The software company Blackbaud has rebuilt the pyramid. In designing a fundraising campaign, planners usually run through an exercise of identifying how many gifts are needed at each level of giving. Getting the totals to add up can be a chore. This online tool yields a simple answer that can be used as a starting point.
Back in my pre-blogging days, I asked the question whether anyone had ever done any research to verify that these are valid expectations. I don't think any has been done, although the pyramid is based on the regular pattern that many distributions fall into, sometimes called a Zipf or Pareto distibution, which is sometime simplified to an 80/20 rule (20% of the donors will account for 80% of the donations). This is the same type of distribution that is the basis for The Long Tail, by Chris Anderson.
But caution to anyone using this tool: there is a problem with what is called the lead gift, the top gift on the pyramid. This calculator assumes that that lead gift will be 10% of the total, but that is not necessarily the case. The lead gift can be much larger than 10% of the total, and there is no way to predict exactly how large it will be, even though the smaller gifts will fall into the Zipf/Pareto pattern . But unfortunately, the top number in one of these distributions can't be predicted.
An example that shows this is the distribution of population by country. There is a pretty regular pattern up to the third largest country, the United States, with 300 million people. But then the top two jump to 1.1 billion for India and 1.3 billion for China. There's no way to predict how much larger a Microsoft or a Google will be than its next largest competitor, and the same is true for the largest gifts.
So a lead gift can be 10% of the total, but it can be 40% or 50%, too. So for a large campaign, don't use the pyramid to set the lead gift. Research the level of the lead gift independently, based on knowledge of the prospective lead donor's circumstances. Then use the pyramid only for the balance of the funds to be raised.
Dan: Your caution is well advised regarding the automatic and fixed calculation table which, in this case revived, has the lead gift at about 10% of the goal. Following your reasoning, here is what I routinely send to folks contacting me seeking to establish a gift table with that base number.
The typical major campaign gift table development process is based on the traditional “80 - 20 rule.” That is, in any successful major fund-raising campaign, you should receive about 80% of your money from about 20% of your donors.
Thus, any campaign goal which is entered for calculation to that ratio, will result in one gift being needed to represent about 10% of the total goal --- and so on.
However, as you work to follow that time-tested guideline, be sure to consider that your calculations might need considerable adjustment depending on the size of your donor base. Circumstances might require that the 80 - 20 benchmark cannot be so rigidly adhered to in every instance.
For example, if an organization wants to raise $5 million for a capital or endowment campaign, the 80 - 20 rule would cite the need for one gift to be in the amount of $500,000, two gifts at $250,000, five gifts at $150,000 --- and so on down the line. Further calculations to descending amounts to equal the total goal, according to the 80 - 20 rule, would end up with the overall need for over 400 gifts to meet the goal.
Since every prospect cannot be expected to give, or to give in the amount requested, an organization in this case will require about three to four times the number of prospects for each of the required gifts. Here, the organization must have about 1,500 prospects identified and rated who are viable and likely prospective donors.
That’s OK for the organizations having a prospect base to be able to process prospects of that magnitude, but for those mostly many others not in that position, you can easily see that the top required gifts must be much larger if the goal is to be met. It those “top-heavy” gifts are not possible, the campaign will not succeed.
So, do work to the 80 - 20 rule, but watch out for problems if your prospect base is not able to support it.
Tony Poderis
Posted by: Tony Poderis | March 13, 2007 at 08:51 AM
Thanks for the link to the gift calculator. A funny thing happens to the calculator once you hit $50 million: every campaign, even up to $1 billion, requires 1884 gifts from 7536 prospects. Odd. I sent them a note.
Posted by: Bedford | February 16, 2009 at 01:46 PM
I loved this post I have book-marked your blog I was very pleased to find this blog Thanks a lot。
Posted by: Gianmarco Lorenzi | July 08, 2011 at 04:20 AM
I am quite interesting in this topic hope you will elaborate more on it in future posts.
Posted by: Sac Longchamp | July 08, 2011 at 04:25 AM
Can anyone tell me how to get the little avatars to show up in my comments section? thanx!
Posted by: ghd lisseur | July 08, 2011 at 04:30 AM
死者·行方不明者約100人に上った台風12号による紀伊半島豪雨から2カ月が経過した。その間、死者·行方不明者や孤立集落が集中した奈良県十津川村や五條市大塔(おおとう)町は注目が集まり、復旧·復興に多くの支援も寄せられた。一方で、被害の深刻さや復旧の姿が伝わらず、風評被害に苦しみながら復興に向かっている被災地もある。
同県中部に位置する川上村は、県内で発生した約1800カ所の土砂崩れの中でも、人家に隣接した崩落としては最大規模で、土砂崩壊量が概算で東京ドーム1杯分に相当する大規模な土砂災害に見舞われた。土砂崩れの発生は9月4日午後5時半ごろ。役場の電灯が突然消え、近くの国道169号を大量の土砂が埋め尽くした。
Posted by: バーバリーマフラー | November 04, 2011 at 03:59 AM
ティンバーランド堺市北区の象印マホービン元副社長、尾崎宗秀さん(84)が自宅で襲われ殺害された事件で、尾崎さんが発見される約2時間前、自宅周辺を黒の原付きバイクで往復する不審な男が目撃されていたことが、捜査関係者への取材で分かった。数日前から近所の複数の住民らも目撃しており、大阪府警はこの男が尾崎さん殺害に関与したとみている。
ティンバーランド捜査関係者によると、尾崎さんは1日午前10時20分ごろ、自宅2階の納戸で顔を粘着テープなどで巻かれ、両手足を結束バンドで縛られた状態で発見された。目撃情報は午前8時前後で、通行人が尾崎さん方の周りを走る不審なバイクの男を見ていた。男は黒っぽい服装で、ヘルメットをかぶっていたという。
Posted by: ティンバーランド | December 12, 2011 at 09:03 PM