Major fundraising plans were based on the 1999 study by John Havens and Paul Schervish, "Millionaires and the Millennium," with subtitle that promised a "Golden Age of Philanthropy." That study forecast a massive transfer of wealth from the WWII and baby boomer generations that would convert to incredible increases in bequests to charitable institutions. But now fundraisers are questioning where the money went, because bequests have not shown anything like the expected uptick in the last eight years. A story about the shortfall in a recent Chronicle of Philanthropy (subscription required) has been republished on the site of the Association of Baltimore Area Grantmakers.
At this point, to reach the projections for the first twenty years of the weath transfer, bequests would have to immediately increase to six times the largest level ever seen. In fact, bequests as reported by Giving USA peaked in 2002 and have declined slightly since.
The researchers are sticking to their guns, just as they did after 9/11 and the dot com bust. (Their 2003 report: "Why the $41 Trillion Wealth Transfer Estimate is Still Valid.") They suggest that the projected fund transfer is merely delayed. However, they also acknowledged that household wealth fell by approximately 5 percent from 1999 to 2002, much different than the study's estimate of 2 percent to 4 percent growth annually.
Another factor may be larger gifts given while people are still alive, through family foundations, charitable trusts, and donor-advised funds.
Others note that the long-term projections are suspect as well, as the model probably has not adequately addressed the rising cost of long-term health care for the baby boomers.
Fundraisers who were planning to sit back and let the money flow in probably will be disappointed.
Here are the original estimates from "Millionaires and the Millenium:" Lower Level Estimate Middle Level Estimate Upper Level Estimate
20 years: $12 trillion total transfer; $1.7 trillion in charitable bequests
55 years: $41 trillion total transfer; $6 trillion in charitable bequests
20 years: $14 trillion total transfer; $2.2 trillion in charitable bequests
55 years: $73 trillion total transfer; $12 trillion in charitable bequests
20 years: $18 trillion total transfer; $2.7 trillion in charitable bequests
55 years: $136 trillion total transfer; $25 trillion in charitable bequests
Hi everyone, good evening, my name is Carl, I share my views with you. The phone is a very interesting step forward, in fact I did not imagine how my life would have been without the phone, is a very simple science, yet a few decades ago was something that had been considered crazy. I am very grateful for sharing with you my opinion.
Posted by: Impotence causes | October 07, 2010 at 11:36 PM
Greetings to all, I consider myself a fan of good articles, this blog is very good, has a great personality, is very original, very comprehensive, usually has very good features, for that reason I will recommend to my friends, I think when you find a good article must be shared.
Posted by: Cheap viagra | October 12, 2010 at 03:43 PM
Great, the inside of the many I expect things. Thank you to let me share the joy. Finally I wish you good health, success in work!
Posted by: cheap jordan shoes | November 11, 2010 at 04:26 AM
I would like to appreciate the great work done by You
Please continue posting like this
Posted by: generic cialis | November 26, 2010 at 12:58 AM
Do you apply that for all levels of education, e.g. do you believe that a six year old child should not get to go to school, if his/her parents can't afford to pay for private education?
Posted by: yiwu china | December 30, 2010 at 02:47 AM
Thanks for this post. I definitely agree with what you are saying. I have been talking about this subject a lot lately with my father so maybe this will get him to see my point of view.
Posted by: Wealthy Affiliate Review | August 06, 2011 at 07:40 AM